When Cultures Collide by Richard D. Lewis

Last updated: Sep 27, 2023

Summary of When Cultures Collide by Richard D. Lewis

1. Cultural Dimensions

In "When Cultures Collide," Richard D. Lewis introduces the concept of cultural dimensions, which are frameworks that help us understand and compare different cultures. Lewis identifies three main cultural dimensions: linear-active, multi-active, and reactive. Linear-active cultures, such as those found in North America and Northern Europe, value punctuality, efficiency, and direct communication. Multi-active cultures, like those in Southern Europe and Latin America, prioritize relationships, emotions, and personal interactions. Reactive cultures, such as those in East Asia, emphasize harmony, respect, and indirect communication.

This understanding of cultural dimensions is actionable because it allows individuals and organizations to adapt their communication and behavior when interacting with people from different cultures. By recognizing and respecting these cultural differences, we can avoid misunderstandings, build stronger relationships, and achieve better outcomes in cross-cultural interactions.

2. High-Context vs. Low-Context Communication

Another key insight from the book is the distinction between high-context and low-context communication. High-context communication relies heavily on non-verbal cues, shared experiences, and implicit understanding. It is prevalent in cultures such as Japan and China. In contrast, low-context communication is more explicit, direct, and relies on verbal communication. It is common in cultures like the United States and Germany.

This insight is profound because it highlights the importance of understanding the cultural context in which communication takes place. By recognizing whether a culture is high-context or low-context, we can adjust our communication style accordingly. For example, in a high-context culture, it is crucial to pay attention to non-verbal cues and read between the lines, while in a low-context culture, being direct and explicit is more effective. This understanding can greatly enhance cross-cultural communication and prevent misunderstandings.

3. Time Orientation

Richard D. Lewis also explores the concept of time orientation in different cultures. He identifies three main time orientations: monochronic, polychronic, and synchronous. Monochronic cultures, such as those in North America and Northern Europe, value punctuality, strict adherence to schedules, and efficient use of time. Polychronic cultures, like those in Southern Europe and Latin America, have a more flexible approach to time and prioritize relationships over strict adherence to schedules. Synchronous cultures, such as those in East Asia, emphasize harmony and coordination of activities.

This insight is original to general knowledge because it sheds light on how different cultures perceive and manage time. By understanding these time orientations, we can adapt our expectations and behaviors when working with individuals from different cultures. For example, in a monochronic culture, it is important to be punctual and respect deadlines, while in a polychronic culture, flexibility and adaptability may be more valued. This understanding can lead to more effective collaboration and reduce conflicts related to time management.

4. Negotiation Styles

The book also delves into the different negotiation styles across cultures. Richard D. Lewis identifies three main negotiation styles: linear-active, reactive, and multi-active. Linear-active negotiators, common in North America and Northern Europe, focus on facts, logic, and efficiency. Reactive negotiators, prevalent in East Asia, prioritize harmony, relationships, and indirect communication. Multi-active negotiators, found in Southern Europe and Latin America, value emotions, personal connections, and flexibility.

This insight is actionable because it allows individuals and organizations to adapt their negotiation strategies when dealing with people from different cultures. By understanding the preferred negotiation style of a particular culture, we can tailor our approach to build rapport, establish trust, and achieve mutually beneficial outcomes. For example, in a reactive culture, it may be more effective to focus on building relationships and finding common ground before discussing business matters. This understanding can lead to more successful negotiations and stronger partnerships.

5. Leadership Styles

Richard D. Lewis also explores the different leadership styles across cultures. He identifies three main leadership styles: egalitarian, hierarchical, and consensual. Egalitarian leaders, common in North America and Northern Europe, value equality, open communication, and participative decision-making. Hierarchical leaders, prevalent in East Asia, emphasize respect for authority, clear roles, and top-down decision-making. Consensual leaders, found in Southern Europe and Latin America, prioritize consensus, harmony, and collective decision-making.

This insight is profound because it highlights the diverse approaches to leadership and management across cultures. By understanding these different leadership styles, we can adapt our leadership approach when working with individuals from different cultures. For example, in a hierarchical culture, it is important to show respect for authority and follow established protocols, while in an egalitarian culture, open communication and involving team members in decision-making may be more effective. This understanding can lead to more effective leadership and collaboration in multicultural environments.

6. Communication Styles

The book also explores the different communication styles across cultures. Richard D. Lewis identifies three main communication styles: linear-active, reactive, and multi-active. Linear-active communicators, common in North America and Northern Europe, value directness, clarity, and efficiency. Reactive communicators, prevalent in East Asia, emphasize indirectness, harmony, and non-verbal cues. Multi-active communicators, found in Southern Europe and Latin America, prioritize emotions, personal connections, and expressive communication.

This insight is original to general knowledge because it highlights how different cultures approach communication. By understanding these communication styles, we can adapt our communication approach to be more effective when interacting with individuals from different cultures. For example, in a reactive culture, it is important to pay attention to non-verbal cues and read between the lines, while in a linear-active culture, being direct and concise is more valued. This understanding can lead to clearer and more successful communication in cross-cultural interactions.

7. Decision-Making Processes

Richard D. Lewis also explores the different decision-making processes across cultures. He identifies three main decision-making processes: linear-active, reactive, and multi-active. Linear-active decision-makers, common in North America and Northern Europe, value efficiency, logic, and data-driven decision-making. Reactive decision-makers, prevalent in East Asia, prioritize consensus, harmony, and indirect decision-making. Multi-active decision-makers, found in Southern Europe and Latin America, value emotions, personal connections, and flexible decision-making.

This insight is actionable because it allows individuals and organizations to adapt their decision-making processes when working with people from different cultures. By understanding the preferred decision-making process of a particular culture, we can involve the right stakeholders, consider different perspectives, and reach decisions that are more acceptable to all parties involved. For example, in a reactive culture, it may be important to seek consensus and involve multiple stakeholders in the decision-making process, while in a linear-active culture, data-driven analysis and efficiency may be more valued. This understanding can lead to more inclusive and effective decision-making in multicultural environments.

8. Work-Life Balance

The book also addresses the concept of work-life balance across cultures. Richard D. Lewis identifies three main approaches to work-life balance: work-oriented, balanced, and life-oriented. Work-oriented cultures, such as those in East Asia, prioritize work over personal life and often have long working hours. Balanced cultures, like those in North America and Northern Europe, strive for a balance between work and personal life. Life-oriented cultures, found in Southern Europe and Latin America, prioritize personal life and leisure over work.

This insight is profound because it highlights the different attitudes towards work and personal life across cultures. By understanding these approaches to work-life balance, we can adapt our expectations and behaviors when working with individuals from different cultures. For example, in a work-oriented culture, it may be important to respect long working hours and avoid scheduling personal activities during work time, while in a life-oriented culture, flexibility and accommodating personal needs may be more valued. This understanding can lead to better work-life integration and employee satisfaction in multicultural workplaces.

Related summaries

• The Culture Map by Erin Meyer
• Global Dexterity by Andy Molinsky
• Intercultural Communication by James W. Neuliep
• Managing Across Cultures by Charlene Solomon and Michael S. Schell
• Cultural Intelligence by David C. Thomas and Kerr Inkson
• Global Business Etiquette by Jeanette S. Martin and Lillian H. Chaney
• Cross-Cultural Business Behavior by Richard R. Gesteland
• Intercultural Competence by Myron W. Lustig and Jolene Koester
• Communication for International Business by Elizabeth P. Tierney
• Cross-Cultural Management by David C. Thomas and Mark F. Peterson
• Globalization and Its Discontents by Joseph E. Stiglitz